<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SugarCRM: Shenanigans!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.x2od.com/2009/11/18/sugarcrm-shenanigans.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.x2od.com/2009/11/18/sugarcrm-shenanigans.html</link>
	<description>Salesforce Configuration, Administration, and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.x2od.com/2009/11/18/sugarcrm-shenanigans.html/comment-page-1#comment-9102</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.x2od.com/?p=809#comment-9102</guid>
		<description>SugarCRM should look in the mirror before they start hurling rocks.

Earlier this year, I was hired into a company that was using SugarCRM. I hadn&#039;t seen it before, but it was clear to me that it was an attempt to clone SFDC&#039;s functionality and -- to a great extent -- SFDC&#039;s look and feel. The staff at this company was on their last nerve with Sugar. The transaction times were often in the 20 - 45 second range, occasionally more than a minute. Queries frequently returned partial results. I politely suggested a switch to SFDC, demoed it for them, and they quickly signed up. I managed to migrate their data from Sugar in a couple of hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SugarCRM should look in the mirror before they start hurling rocks.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, I was hired into a company that was using SugarCRM. I hadn&#8217;t seen it before, but it was clear to me that it was an attempt to clone SFDC&#8217;s functionality and &#8212; to a great extent &#8212; SFDC&#8217;s look and feel. The staff at this company was on their last nerve with Sugar. The transaction times were often in the 20 &#8211; 45 second range, occasionally more than a minute. Queries frequently returned partial results. I politely suggested a switch to SFDC, demoed it for them, and they quickly signed up. I managed to migrate their data from Sugar in a couple of hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
